Jean-Charles v. State
Jean-Charles appealed a withhold of adjudication for resisting an officer without violence, arguing the trial court committed fundamental error by proceeding to a bench trial without a written waiver or an adequate oral colloquy establishing a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of his right to a jury trial. The Third DCA agreed, holding the brief exchange in which the defendant simply confirmed he wished to reject a plea and 'proceed to a bench trial' did not satisfy Tucker's requirement of a full explanation of the consequences of waiving a jury trial, and reversed for a new trial.
Key facts
- Jean-Charles was charged with resisting an officer without violence, a first-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to one year imprisonment.
- At trial, the trial court proceeded to a bench trial after a brief exchange in which the defendant confirmed he wished to reject a plea offer and proceed without a jury, with no written waiver or full oral colloquy explaining the consequences of waiving jury trial rights.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This opinion reinforces the bright-line rule that an invalid jury-trial waiver is fundamental, per se reversible error reviewable even without preservation, and clarifies that a court's brief confirmation that a… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.