Irama Valdes v. In Re: Estate of Andres Jesus Capetillo
The Third District affirmed a probate court's determination of attorney's fees in an estate administration, resolving the appeal by citation opinion. The court anchored the affirmance in section 733.6171(5), Florida Statutes (2025), and the line of authority holding that the touchstone for probate attorney compensation is reasonableness, measured against the nature and necessity of the services performed. Because a fee award — whether grounded in contract or statute — is reviewed only for abuse of discretion, and reasonable judges could differ as to the amount fixed, the probate court's ruling was insulated from reversal.
Key facts
- Irama Valdes, an attorney appearing through her own professional association, sought compensation in connection with the probate administration of the Estate of Andres Jesus Capetillo in Miami-Dade County (Lower Tribunal No. 21-910-CP-02).
- The probate court, Judge Maria de Jesus Santovenia presiding, entered an order fixing the compensation at an amount Valdes challenged on appeal.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Holdings
- Attorney compensation in a probate administration is governed by section 733.6171(5), Florida Statutes, and the controlling inquiry is whether the fee is 'reasonable'; the probate court…
- +1 more holding with a free trial
Why it matters
This citation opinion is a compact restatement of the standard that governs every contested fee application in a Florida probate administration, and it is useful well beyond the probate bar. First, it confirms that… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.