Infinity Auto Insurance Company v. Miami Open MRI, LLC, a/a/o Rolando Amador
A PIP insurer's $100 proposal for settlement was invalidated by the trial court on the ground that its Paragraph Eight — reserving the insurer's rights and defenses in "any other actions or lawsuits now or hereafter pending relating to the claim" — was ambiguous and designed to extinguish claims outside the action. The Third DCA reversed, holding that the proposal read as a whole was neither ambiguous nor overbroad, because Paragraph Four expressly limited resolution to the claims in the pending case and Paragraph Six required dismissal only of "this case."
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.