Hudson v. State
The First DCA reversed the denial of a DUI defendant's motion to suppress statements made while handcuffed in the back of a patrol car before receiving Miranda warnings. Applying the Ramirez custody factors, the court held that because Hudson was handcuffed for 36 minutes, never told she was free to leave, and was questioned in a manner reasonably calculated to elicit incriminating responses, she was in custody for Miranda purposes, rendering her unwarned statements inadmissible. The court rejected the trial court's rule that handcuffing for officer safety during a traffic stop does not elevate the encounter to custodial status.
Key facts
- Hudson was detained and handcuffed in the back of a patrol car for approximately 36 minutes during a traffic stop, during which officers questioned her about recent store visits and alcohol consumption without first providing Miranda warnings.
- The trial court denied Hudson's motion to suppress her statements, applying a categorical rule that handcuffing for officer safety during a traffic stop does not elevate the encounter to custodial status for Miranda purposes.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This decision is useful to DUI and suppression practitioners because it pushes back against the common law-enforcement and trial-court assumption that handcuffing during a traffic stop, if justified by officer safety… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.