Howard v. State
An inmate serving sentences for first-degree murder and robbery filed a habeas petition claiming a self-executing parole-eligibility provision in section 775.082(1), Fla. Stat. (1993). The Third DCA held the petition should have been treated as sounding in mandamus rather than habeas, and that venue for such an action against the Florida Commission on Offender Review properly lies in Leon County, the agency's headquarters, not Miami-Dade. The court reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate and transfer the petition to Leon County without addressing the merits.
Key facts
- An inmate serving sentences for first-degree murder and robbery filed a habeas petition challenging his parole eligibility under section 775.082(1), Fla. Stat. (1993).
- The trial court dismissed the petition for legal insufficiency, and the inmate appealed.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This decision reinforces that inmate challenges to parole/offender-review decisions, even when styled as habeas petitions, must be treated as mandamus actions subject to the home-venue privilege requiring transfer to… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.