← Case library
1st DCANovember 22, 2023Petition Denied⭐ Notable

Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. v. Thompson

Case No. 1D2023-0970

An insurer sought certiorari review of a discovery order compelling production of portions of its claims and underwriting files in the insureds' first-party hurricane breach-of-contract suit. The First DCA accepted jurisdiction but denied the petition, holding that documents in claims and underwriting files are not categorically work product and that the insurer failed to show they were prepared in anticipation of litigation.

Key facts

  • Homeowners Choice, an insurer, sought certiorari review to prevent disclosure of portions of its claims and underwriting files that were requested by insureds in their first-party hurricane breach-of-contract lawsuit.
  • The trial court issued a discovery order compelling the insurer to produce documents from its claims and underwriting files; the insurer claimed the documents were protected as work product and proprietary.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

Reinforces People's Trust Insurance Co. v. Foster and gives first-party policyholder counsel a direct citation to defeat insurers' sweeping 'claims file is privileged until bad faith' objections. Practitioners should… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.