← Case library
3rd DCAOctober 28, 2026Affirmed⭐ Notable

Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Moise

Case No. 3D2024-1000

The Third DCA affirmed a judgment for a homeowner on a claim for cracking damage caused by vibrations from demolition at an adjacent property. The court held that the policy's earth movement and settlement exclusions did not bar coverage where the insured's expert opined the damage was caused by vibrations 'without displacement of the earth,' creating a jury question; it also affirmed summary judgment striking the insurer's post-loss-obligation defenses as waived by the coverage denial, and affirmed a money damages award in a declaratory judgment action.

📄 Read the official opinion (3rd DCA) →

Florida Court Tracker flags decisions like this the week they come down, sorted by practice area, alongside your research platform. See what else changed in Homeowners / Property Insurance →

Key facts

  • Homeowner Moise held a homeowners insurance policy with Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Co. that covered cracking damage to the insured property.
  • Cracking damage to Moise's home occurred following demolition work at an adjacent property that caused vibrations.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial
Best value · free

Get decisions like this in your practice area every week: free for 14 days

The rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Your practice areas first
  • Plain-English holdings & why it matters
  • Statutes & rules that take effect in your area
  • One Friday briefing for your team
Start my free 14-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.