← Case library
3rd DCAMay 24, 2023Affirmed⭐ Notable

Hawks Nest Condominium, Inc. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Co.

Case No. 3D2022-0102

After Hurricane Irma damage, the insurer never denied coverage but delayed, prompting the insured to petition to compel appraisal; the insurer voluntarily went to appraisal and paid the award slightly late. The Third DCA affirmed the trial court's denial of prejudgment interest from the date of loss, holding that mere delay (plus an initial default and partial affirmative defenses) is not the functional equivalent of a coverage denial that triggers the Lugassy exception; interest ran only from the policy's payment date after the appraisal award.

Key facts

  • Hawks Nest Condominium sought insurance coverage from Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance for Hurricane Irma damage to its property.
  • The insurer did not deny coverage but delayed adjustment and payment of the claim, prompting Hawks Nest to petition to compel appraisal.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This opinion sharply cabins the Lugassy date-of-loss prejudgment interest exception in first-party property cases, giving carriers a strong defense that even egregious delay, a default, and pleaded coverage defenses do… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.