← Case library
3rd DCAAugust 20, 2025Affirmed

Haedo Transportation Solutions, LLC v. Signature Flight Support, LLC

Case No. 3D24-1258

In a negligence suit arising from aircraft damage during a hangar tow, the Third DCA affirmed on all three issues: the contractual jury trial waiver (backed by a written non-waiver clause) was enforceable and was not forfeited by mere litigation delay; any error in granting summary judgment on the simple negligence claim via exculpatory clauses was rendered harmless by the bench trial finding that Signature committed no negligent act causing damage to the aircraft's nose gear.

Key facts

  • Haedo stored its aircraft at Signature's Miami hangar under a written agreement that included exculpatory clauses, a jury trial waiver, and a non-waiver clause requiring all waivers to be in writing.
  • Approximately one month after execution, Haedo's aircraft was damaged; Haedo alleged Signature's employee over-torqued the nose gear during a hangar tow and sued for simple and gross negligence.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • Under Florida law, contractual jury trial waivers are enforceable; when the contract also contains a non-waiver clause requiring all waivers to be explicitly set forth in writing, mere…
  • +1 more holding with a free trial
Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.