← Case library
1st DCAApril 2, 2025Reversed in Part, Affirmed in Part, and Remanded

Glades Restoration, LLC., a.a.o Jimmy McKinstry v. Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc., a Florida Corporation

Case No. 2023-2809

The First DCA reversed two pre-answer dismissals with prejudice entered against an AOB contractor pursuing payment from a homeowner's insurer under § 627.7152. The court held that dismissal without leave to amend was an abuse of discretion where the only defect was the failure to attach an itemized services list and the plaintiff had preserved a request to amend with remediable documentation.

Key facts

  • Glades Restoration, LLC brought suit as assignee of homeowner Jimmy McKinstry under an assignment of benefits (AOB) for restoration services covered by Homeowners Choice Property & Casualty Insurance.
  • The first complaint was dismissed with prejudice for failure to attach the itemized services-and-prices list required by § 627.7152(2), despite counsel's oral request for leave to amend.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • Leave to amend should be freely given and dismissal with prejudice is an abuse of discretion where no amendment privilege has been abused, the opposing party would suffer no prejudice, and…
  • +3 more holdings with a free trial
Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.