← Case library
4th DCAOctober 22, 2025Reversed

Geico Indemnity Company v. Plantation Open MRI, LLC, et al.

Case No. 4D2023-2618

In 24 consolidated PIP cases, the Fourth DCA reversed county court judgments that had awarded providers attorney's fees under section 627.428 based on a purported confession of judgment by GEICO. The court held that (1) a confession of judgment cannot occur before service of process on the insurer, and (2) the doctrine requires that the suit itself be the necessary catalyst for payment — not a simultaneously filed civil remedy notice.

Key facts

  • GEICO paid PIP claims for diagnostic services but reduced reimbursement to 2007 Medicare Part B limiting charge rates and then applied a further Medicare Budget Neutrality Adjustment (BNA), which providers disputed.
  • Providers filed declaratory judgment petitions challenging the BNA reduction and simultaneously filed Civil Remedy Notices with the Department of Financial Services — but did not obtain or serve summonses on GEICO at the time of filing.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • A court lacks jurisdiction to enter judgment based on a confession of judgment when the defendant has not yet been served with process; due process requires that service of process precede…
  • +1 more holding with a free trial
Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.