← Case library
5th DCAApril 28, 2023Petition Dismissed⭐ Notable

Fucci v. State

Case No. 5D2023-0749

A juvenile defendant charged with first-degree murder sought certiorari review of a trial court order empaneling a six-person jury instead of twelve, arguing the charge was capital in nature. The Fifth District dismissed the petition as moot because the defendant pleaded guilty and waived his right to a jury trial before the court ruled, and alternatively held he could not show irreparable harm or a departure from the essential requirements of the law. The court reaffirmed that under Walling v. State and State v. Dagostino, a defendant who is constitutionally ineligible for the death penalty due to age is entitled only to a six-person jury even on a nominally capital charge.

Key facts

  • Juvenile defendant was charged with first-degree murder and sought certiorari review challenging a trial court order empaneling a six-person jury instead of twelve.
  • Defendant argued he was entitled to a twelve-person jury because the charge was capital in nature, but pleaded guilty and waived his right to a jury trial before the court ruled on his petition.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This opinion reinforces that a guilty plea waiving jury trial rights moots any pending certiorari challenge to jury-selection orders, a useful procedural point for appellate practitioners handling interlocutory criminal… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.