Ford v. State
The First DCA reversed Ford's aggravated stalking conviction, holding the State failed to present sufficient evidence that Ford's phone calls to the victim caused 'substantial emotional distress,' an essential element of harassment under section 784.048(1)(a). A deputy's brief testimony that the victim was 'concerned' and 'worried' was insufficient, as such feelings do not rise to the level of substantial emotional distress, and evidence of the parties' fuller history was introduced only at sentencing, not before the jury.
Key facts
- Ford was charged with aggravated stalking based on phone calls made to the victim.
- At trial, a deputy testified that the victim was 'concerned' and 'worried,' but evidence of Ford's and the victim's fuller history was introduced only during sentencing, not during the State's case-in-chief.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This decision clarifies the evidentiary bar for 'substantial emotional distress' in aggravated stalking prosecutions, reinforcing that generic third-party characterizations of a victim's emotional state (e.g… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.