← Case library
3rd DCAOctober 31, 2018Petition Denied⭐ Notable

Florida Power & Light Company v. Velez

Case No. 18-1002

FPL sought prohibition to stop a putative class action by customers alleging breach of contract and gross negligence for failure to meet PSC storm-hardening standards, arguing the PSC had exclusive jurisdiction. The Third DCA denied the petition, holding the circuit court retains jurisdiction over claims for money damages based on past conduct, even where the claims turn on whether a utility met PSC-established standards.

Key facts

  • FPL sought a writ of prohibition to halt a putative class action brought by customers alleging breach of contract and gross negligence for FPL's failure to meet PSC-established storm-hardening standards.
  • The circuit court denied FPL's motion to dismiss on grounds of lack of jurisdiction, allowing the class action to proceed.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

A useful, citable reaffirmation that utility defendants cannot use PSC 'exclusive jurisdiction' to oust circuit courts from damages actions grounded in regulatory standards — important for storm-damage and utility class… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.