← Case library
3rd DCAMarch 22, 2023Petition Denied⭐ Notable

Federal Express Corporation v. Sabbah

Case No. 3D2022-0253

FedEx sought review of an order granting leave to amend to add punitive damages, arguing the January 2022 amendment to Rule 9.130(a)(3)(G) (effective April 1, 2022) allowed a non-final appeal. The Third District held that because both the order and the petition predated the rule's effective date, review was limited to the narrow certiorari standard — compliance with the procedural requirements of section 768.72 — and denied the petition because the trial court followed those procedures. Judge Gordo concurred in result only, criticizing Florida jurisprudence on the retroactive/prospective application of rule amendments as unpredictable.

Key facts

  • FedEx sought appellate review of a trial court order granting leave to amend the complaint to add punitive damages claims.
  • The trial court granted the amendment after finding compliance with the procedural requirements of section 768.72.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This decision fixes the dividing line for punitive-damages review in the Third District: petitions/notices filed before April 1, 2022 get only narrow procedural certiorari review, while later-filed proceedings get de… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.