← Case library
3rd DCAMay 21, 2025Affirmed

Doron Jockey Club, LLC v. The Jockey Club Condominium Apartments, Inc.

Case No. 3D24-0930

The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the Miami-Dade Circuit Court's judgment in favor of The Jockey Club Condominium Apartments, Inc. against Doron Jockey Club, LLC in a dispute concerning access to or use of condominium premises. The court upheld the trial court's factual findings under the competent substantial evidence standard, applying the established principle that permission to enter premises may be implied from custom, usage, or conduct.

Key facts

  • Doron Jockey Club, LLC (appellant) and The Jockey Club Condominium Apartments, Inc. (appellee) litigated a premises-access dispute in Miami-Dade Circuit Court, Lower Tribunal No. 22-844-CA-01, before Judge Lisa S. Walsh.
  • The trial court entered judgment in favor of the condominium association, finding that whatever access or entry was at issue was permissible under the implied-license doctrine.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Holdings

  • Legal sufficiency of a judgment is reviewed for competent substantial evidence. Tibbs v. State, 397 So. 2d 1120, 1123 (Fla. 1981).
  • +2 more holdings with a free trial
Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.