← Case library
1st DCAJanuary 31, 2024Petition Granted (release ordered unless trial court sets reasonable conditions or complies with §907.041(5))⭐ Notable

Dominguez v. Cloutier

Case No. 1D2024-0071

The First DCA granted an emergency habeas petition ordering release of a pretrial detainee unless the trial court set reasonable conditions of release or entered a proper pretrial detention order under section 907.041(5). Judge Ray's concurrence explains that the trial court had ordered pretrial release but conditioned it on a $500,000 bond the undisputed evidence showed the petitioner and his family could not afford (at most $250,000), effectively converting a release order into indefinite detention without following the constitutional and statutory pretrial detention procedure.

Key facts

  • Dominguez, a pretrial detainee charged with a non-capital, non-life felony, sought emergency habeas relief after the trial court ordered his pretrial release but conditioned it on a $500,000 bond that he and his family could not afford to pay.
  • The trial court did not hold a pretrial detention hearing under section 907.041(5) or make findings supporting detention; instead, it issued a release order with an unaffordable monetary bail amount that effectively prevented the defendant's release.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Why it matters

This concurrence provides a rare, citable articulation of the limits on setting monetary bail so high that it functions as de facto pretrial detention without the State meeting its burden under the pretrial detention… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.