← Case library
2nd DCAOctober 30, 2026Affirmed⭐ Notable

Diamond Edge Construction, LLC v. The Moorings of Pinellas County Condominium Ass'n, Inc.

Case No. 2D2026-0713

Diamond Edge, an unlicensed contractor, moved to compel arbitration under an unsigned Construction Services Agreement that lacked a scope of work and contract price. The Second District affirmed denial of the motion, holding that the movant failed to prove an agreement to arbitrate existed: allegations in a complaint that is not yet at issue are not binding admissions, the owner's unexplained $818,266.02 payment could not be tied to the agreement so as to show acquiescence, and the document itself was at best an unenforceable agreement to agree missing essential terms.

📄 Read the official opinion (2nd DCA) →

Florida Court Tracker flags decisions like this the week they come down, sorted by practice area, alongside your research platform. See what else changed in Arbitration →

Key facts

  • Diamond Edge Construction, LLC, an unlicensed contractor, sought to compel arbitration of a dispute with The Moorings of Pinellas County Condominium Association based on a Construction Services Agreement.
  • The unsigned agreement at issue lacked essential terms, including a defined scope of work and contract price.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial
Best value · free

Get decisions like this in your practice area every week: free for 14 days

The rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Your practice areas first
  • Plain-English holdings & why it matters
  • Statutes & rules that take effect in your area
  • One Friday briefing for your team
Start my free 14-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.