← Case library
FL Supreme CourtApril 28, 2022Certified question answered in the negative; Second District decision approved⭐ Notable

Dial v. Calusa Palms Master Association, Inc.

Case No. SC21-43

In a slip-and-fall negligence case, the trial court limited the plaintiff to introducing the discounted amounts Medicare actually paid for her past medical care rather than the gross billed amounts. The Florida Supreme Court answered the Second District's certified question in the negative, holding that Joerg v. State Farm u2014which barred evidence of a plaintiff's eligibility for future Medicare benefits u2014applies only to future medical expenses and has no application to past medical expenses. The Court approved the Second District's decision, leaving intact Cooperative Leasing's rule limiting past medical damages to amounts actually paid.

Key facts

  • Plaintiff Dial filed a slip-and-fall negligence case against Calusa Palms Master Association, Inc., a property owner or manager.
  • At trial, the court limited Dial's evidence of past medical expenses to the discounted amounts that Medicare actually paid, rather than allowing her to present the gross billed amounts.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This is a major damages decision for Florida personal injury practice: defendants can continue to limit a Medicare-eligible plaintiff's proof of past medical expenses to the discounted amounts actually paid, avoiding… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.