← Case library
5th DCANovember 9, 2023Decided⭐ Notable

Department of Children and Families v. J.G., A Child, and State of Florida

Case No. 5D2023-2362

DCF sought certiorari to quash a circuit court order committing a juvenile to DCF for competency restoration services, where evaluators found the minor incompetent due to age/immaturity rather than mental illness, intellectual disability, or autism. The Fifth DCA granted the petition, holding that section 985.19(2) expressly bars commitment to DCF for restoration services when incompetence stems from age or immaturity rather than a qualifying mental condition. The court also noted, without resolving, that the competency evaluations relied upon were stale by the time of the commitment order.

Key facts

  • Department of Children and Families sought certiorari review of a circuit court order committing a juvenile to DCF for competency restoration services.
  • Two evaluators found the juvenile incompetent due to age and immaturity rather than mental illness, intellectual disability, or autism.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This opinion clarifies a statutory limit on juvenile competency commitments: DCF cannot be ordered to provide restoration services when the juvenile's incompetence is attributable to age/immaturity rather than an… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.