← Case library
6th DCAJune 12, 2026Affirmed⭐ Notable

Corina Dawson Parker v. Hotel Lake Placid, LLC d/b/a Holiday Inn Express

Case No. 2024-2007

The Sixth DCA affirmed summary judgment for the hotel in a premises liability case, citing the open-and-obvious doctrine and the invitee's own duty of reasonable care for her safety. The court also reiterated the post-2021 summary judgment standard requiring the nonmoving party to identify affirmative evidence creating a genuine dispute of material fact.

Key facts

  • Corina Dawson Parker brought a premises liability action against Hotel Lake Placid, LLC, doing business as Holiday Inn Express, arising from an injury on the hotel premises.
  • The hotel moved for summary judgment, and the trial court entered judgment in its favor.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Holdings

  • A proprietor may assume that an invitee will perceive conditions that would be obvious upon the ordinary use of her senses, and the invitee is obligated to exercise a reasonable degree of…
  • +1 more holding with a free trial

Why it matters

The opinion is a useful citation point for defense practitioners in premises liability matters, pairing the longstanding open-and-obvious/invitee-duty principles from Earley with the heightened post-2021 Florida summary… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.