← Case library
3rd DCAOctober 31, 2018Reversed and Remanded⭐ Notable

Berenyi v. Florida Department of Children and Families

Case No. 18-0922

Paternal grandparents who had filed their own petition to adopt a dependent child, participated throughout the post-TPR proceedings as 'Intervenors,' and obtained relief (Skype visitation) were given no notice of the foster parents' adoption petition, which the trial court granted within three hours of its filing after a brief hearing. The Third DCA reversed the final judgment of adoption, holding the grandparents were 'legally interested parties' entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Key facts

  • Paternal grandparents filed their own petition to adopt a dependent child and participated as intervenors throughout post-termination of parental rights proceedings, obtaining Skype visitation relief.
  • Foster parents filed an adoption petition without notice to the grandparents; the trial court granted the adoption within three hours of filing after a brief hearing.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Why it matters

The opinion is a useful citation for litigators facing an argument that a client is a 'non-party' lacking standing because no written intervention order exists: the Third DCA looked to the parties' and court's actual… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.