← Case library
4th DCAJanuary 14, 2026Affirmed🔬 Novel Issue

Beck v. North Broward Hospital District d/b/a Broward Health

Case No. 4D2024-1814

Former patients brought a putative class action against a public hospital district for negligence and breach of contract arising from a 2021 data breach. The Fourth DCA affirmed dismissal with prejudice, holding that section 768.28(1)'s limited tort waiver does not reach purely economic/privacy damages absent actual damage to tangible property, and that HIPAA notices, a Patient's Bill of Rights, medical staff bylaws, and a code of conduct are informational documents that do not constitute the express written contract required to waive immunity in contract.

Key facts

  • Former patients filed a putative class action against North Broward Hospital District, a public hospital, alleging negligence and breach of contract arising from a 2021 data breach that compromised their personal and health information.
  • The trial court dismissed the complaint with prejudice; the Fourth DCA affirmed, holding that sovereign immunity under section 768.28(1) does not waive for purely economic and privacy damages absent actual damage to tangible property.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This is the Fourth DCA's first substantial statement on whether Florida public hospitals and other governmental entities can be sued for data breaches, and the answer is largely no: privacy-based and economic… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.