Beasley v. State
Beasley challenged his dual convictions for grand theft of an automobile and petit theft of tools found inside it as violating double jeopardy. The First DCA affirmed, holding that because the car and tools were taken from different victims under different circumstances and with different intent (he later returned the car but never the tools), the thefts were distinct criminal acts rather than a single core theft offense.
Key facts
- Beasley was convicted of both grand theft of an automobile and petit theft of tools that were inside the vehicle.
- Beasley obtained the tools from one person under false pretenses and later took the car from a different owner under a separate pretext; he returned the car but never returned the tools.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
This opinion refines the double-jeopardy analysis for multi-item theft cases involving a vehicle and property inside it, an issue that recurs frequently in theft prosecutions. It clarifies that Hearn's 'same time… — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.