← Case library
3rd DCAJune 25, 2025Affirmed⭐ Notable

Barnes v. State

Case No. 3D2023-2155

The Third DCA affirmed Barnes's convictions for second-degree murder and attempted second-degree murder arising from the El Mula Banquet Hall mass shooting, rejecting his challenges to the admission of the rap video 'Mr. Pull Up' and the trial court's refusal to give the Independent Act jury instruction. The court held the video was properly admitted under §90.403 because it was probative of Barnes's knowledge of his codefendants' violent intentions and rebutted his defense that he was unaware of their plans, and that the Independent Act instruction was inapplicable because the evidence did not support a theory that a codefendant deviated from a lesser common plan.

Key facts

  • Barnes was charged with second-degree murder and attempted second-degree murder for his role in the El Mula Banquet Hall mass shooting, allegedly as a lookout for his codefendants.
  • At trial, the prosecution introduced a rap video titled 'Mr. Pull Up' created by a codefendant that featured Barnes, and the trial court denied Barnes's request for an Independent Act jury instruction.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This opinion gives Florida criminal practitioners a useful articulation of the standard for admitting rap videos as substantive evidence of motive, knowledge, or association under §90.403, aligning with Wright, Hayes… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.