← Case library
FL Supreme CourtJune 3, 2021Certified question answered in the affirmative; Fourth District decision quashed and remanded🔬 Novel Issue

Arch Insurance Co. v. Kubicki Draper, LLP

Case No. SC19-673

Arch Insurance retained Kubicki Draper to defend its insured accounting firm, then sued the firm for malpractice after alleging the firm failed to timely raise a statute of limitations defense, increasing the settlement cost. The trial court and Fourth District held Arch lacked standing because it was not in privity with the law firm. The Florida Supreme Court quashed, holding that although the law firm was in privity only with the insured, the insurer has standing to maintain a legal malpractice action against defense counsel where the insurer is contractually subrogated to the insured's rights under the policy.

Key facts

  • Arch Insurance retained Kubicki Draper, LLP to defend Arch's insured accounting firm in litigation; Arch later alleged the law firm committed malpractice by failing to timely raise a statute of limitations defense, which increased the settlement cost.
  • The trial court dismissed Arch's malpractice claim for lack of standing based on absence of privity between Arch and the law firm; the Fourth District affirmed.
  • +1 more key fact with a free trial

Why it matters

This is a landmark ruling resolving a long-contested question in the insurer-insured-defense counsel tripartite relationship: insurers can now sue panel or retained defense counsel for malpractice via contractual… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.