← Case library
3rd DCAFebruary 2, 2022Affirmed in part; Reversed and Remanded for limited evidentiary hearing⭐ Notable

Apollo Trust v. BNP Paribas Jersey Trust Corporation Limited

Case No. 20-0180

BNP domesticated a Jersey judgment and worldwide freeze order against judgment debtor Edoarda Crociani and instituted proceedings supplementary to reach seven paintings stored in a Miami art vault, impleading Apollo Trust and its trustees, who claimed to own the artwork. The Third District held that BNP's motion alleged sufficient long-arm facts, but that the minimum-contacts/connexity question turns on whether the judgment debtor holds an executable interest in the Miami artwork — a disputed factual issue requiring a limited evidentiary hearing under Venetian Salami and Tabet.

Key facts

  • BNP Paribas Jersey Trust Corporation domesticated a Jersey judgment and worldwide freeze order against judgment debtor Edoarda Crociani and sought to reach seven paintings stored in a Miami art vault through supplementary proceedings.
  • Apollo Trust and its trustees were impleaded as defendants, claiming to own the artwork; BNP alleged the foreign trust had shipped the artwork to Florida, contracted for storage, obtained Florida insurance, engaged a Florida appraiser, and retained Florida counsel.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This opinion maps the intersection of proceedings supplementary, domesticated foreign judgments, and long-arm jurisdiction over impleaded nonresident asset holders — a recurring problem in asset-recovery practice… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.