← Case library
3rd DCASeptember 26, 2018Petitions Granted; Orders Quashed↗ Precedent Departure

Amerisure Insurance Company v. Lazaro Rodriguez

Case No. 18-1058

Amerisure sought certiorari review of orders setting a third-party spoliation claim for trial alongside the plaintiff's underlying premises liability case and compelling spoliation-related discovery. The Third DCA held that a third-party spoliation claim does not accrue until the underlying tort action is resolved, so such claims should generally be abated or dismissed until then, and quashed the orders as causing irreparable harm.

Key facts

  • Amerisure Insurance Company sought certiorari review of trial court orders that set a third-party spoliation claim for trial alongside plaintiff Lazaro Rodriguez's underlying premises liability case and compelled spoliation-related discovery.
  • The trial court had allowed the spoliation claim to proceed concurrently with the underlying tort action without abating or dismissing it pending resolution of the premises liability case.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This is a clear statement of Third DCA law that a third-party spoliation count cannot be litigated or tried with the underlying tort claim, giving defendants a ready basis to seek abatement or dismissal and, if denied… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.