← Case library
3rd DCAMay 27, 2020Affirmed⭐ Notable

Alobaid v. Khan

Case No. 19-2128

The Third DCA affirmed a permanent domestic violence injunction and a temporary time-sharing plan entered against a Kuwaiti citizen/resident husband. The court held personal jurisdiction existed both because he was personally served while voluntarily present in Florida and under the long-arm statute's tortious-act provision (an in-state battery), where he filed only an unsworn motion and no counter-affidavit. It further held the domestic violence court had temporary emergency jurisdiction under section 61.517(1) to enter a temporary time-sharing plan because the child was physically present in Florida, regardless of which country is the home state under the UCCJEA.

Key facts

  • Wife sought a permanent domestic violence injunction and temporary time-sharing arrangement against her husband, a Kuwaiti citizen and resident, in Florida state court.
  • The trial court entered a permanent domestic violence injunction and a temporary time-sharing plan after finding the husband committed multiple acts of violence including slapping, pushing, shoving, and kicking, and threatened to relocate their child abroad.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

Useful for litigators handling cross-border domestic violence and custody disputes: it confirms that tag-service on a voluntarily present foreign national suffices for personal jurisdiction and that an in-state act of… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.