← Case library
6th DCAJuly 17, 2026Affirmed in part, Reversed and Remanded in part⭐ Notable

Alleyne v. State

Case No. 6D2024-2490

The Sixth DCA addressed discrepancies between oral pronouncements and written sentences in two misdemeanor traffic cases, and reviewed the trial court's imposition of court costs and a public defender application fee. The court held the written sentence must conform to the oral pronouncement as to the $273 cost figure, but remanded for the trial court to state the statutory basis for costs since it was not otherwise evident in the record. The court also held the $50 public defender application fee under §§27.52 and 938.29 is mandatory and could not be waived, so the written sentence properly included it despite the trial court's oral waiver.

Key facts

  • Two misdemeanor traffic cases where the trial court issued oral sentences that differed from written sentences regarding cost amounts and a public defender application fee.
  • At sentencing, the trial court orally pronounced certain cost figures and verbally waived a $50 public defender application fee, but the written sentences reflected different cost amounts and included the $50 fee.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

This opinion gives practitioners a citable reaffirmation that the mandatory $50 public defender application fee cannot be waived by the trial court even if pronounced orally, meaning defense counsel should not rely on… — full analysis with a trial

🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.