← Case library
6th DCAMay 26, 2023Reversed and Remanded⭐ Notable

Advanced Florida Medical Group, Corp. (a/a/o Weir) v. Progressive American Insurance Co.

Case No. 6D2023-0482

A PIP insurer pled as an affirmative defense that the insured 'failed to appear' for an examination under oath, but moved for and obtained summary judgment on the theory that she 'failed to submit' to the EUO after appearing but disputing videorecording. The Sixth DCA reversed, holding the insurer was bound by its pleading and that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on an unpled affirmative defense.

Key facts

  • PIP insurer Advanced Florida Medical Group obtained summary judgment against insured Weir on the theory that she failed to submit to an examination under oath (EUO), despite pleading only that she failed to appear for the EUO.
  • Insured appeared at the scheduled EUO but disputed the insurer's requirement that the examination be videorecorded, and the insurer then moved for summary judgment on the unpled ground of failure to submit.
  • +2 more key facts with a free trial

Why it matters

Useful for PIP and first-party insurance litigators facing EUO-compliance defenses: the opinion draws a meaningful distinction between an insured who never shows up and one who appears but refuses to proceed on the… — full analysis with a trial

Best value · free

Read the full opinion, holdings & search — free for 30 days

The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision — in your hands.

  • Search every tracked Florida decision in seconds
  • Save, tag & file the cases that matter into your own library
  • Read the full plain-English analysis and holdings
Start my free 30-day trial → No credit card required
👀 Take a quick tour of the site → 60 seconds · click a real case · no login

Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.

Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.