6D2024-0121
The State appealed a trial court's dismissal, under Rule 3.190(c)(4), of a charge of carrying a concealed weapon by a convicted felon involving a machete. The trial court had dismissed the charge because the defendant did not use or threaten to use the machete in a dangerous manner. The Sixth DCA reversed, holding that whether an object is a 'deadly weapon' under the concealed-weapon statute turns on the object's design and construction, not on how it was used, and remanded for the jury to decide whether the machete qualified.
Key facts
- The State appealed a trial court's dismissal of a concealed weapon charge against a convicted felon who was found carrying a machete.
- The trial court dismissed the charge under Rule 3.190(c)(4), reasoning that the defendant did not use or threaten to use the machete in a dangerous manner.
- +2 more key facts with a free trial
Why it matters
placeholder — full analysis with a trial
🔒 Read the full opinion, holding & search the library
The full opinion PDF, the rules the court applied, our significance analysis, the background facts, and full-text search across every tracked Florida decision are available to members. Start a free 30-day trial — no credit card.
Not ready to sign up? Get the free Friday digest — the week's key Florida decisions by email, no login required.
Florida Court Tracker provides summaries of publicly available court opinions for informational and research purposes only. This is not legal advice and does not create an attorney–client relationship. Always verify holdings against the official opinion.